Variations in phosphorus concentration, accumulation and partitioning in some of crop and weed species of Poaceae family

Document Type : original paper

Authors

1 Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences & Natural Resources

2 Associate professor, Agronomy department, Gorgan Univerity of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources

3 Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences & Natural Resources

4 cotto research institu of iran

Abstract

Background and objectives: Phosphorus (P) after nitrogen is the most important nutrient limiting the yield of crops especially in acidic and alkaline soils. Extensive studies indicate considerable genetic variation in the efficiency of uptake and utilization of phosphorus which is related to concentration, accumulation and allocation of phosphorus to different parts of the plant. The use of this diversity in order to increase the growth and yield of crops, as well as to reduce the need for phosphorus fertilizers, especially in low-phosphorous soils, has attracted the attention of researchers in recent years. In addition, accurate information on this issue can be used in the efficient management of mineral nutrition of crops. Therefore, the present study was conducted to investigate the variations in concentration, accumulation and allocation of P to different parts of the plant in some important crops and weeds species of the Poaceae family.
Materials and methods: This experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design with a factorial arrangement with three replications in Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences using a low (4.85 mg / kg) available P soil during 2016-17 growing season. In this pot study, 6 crop and weed species of Poaceae family including durum wheat, common barley, naked barley, triticale, wild oat and canary grass were studied under two conditions of non-consumption and use of fertilizer as amount as recommended. In the physiological maturity, P concentration in different parts of plants separately, and P accumulation and allocation coefficients were calculated using P concentration and dry weight of the organs.
Results: The results of analysis of variance showed that the effect of genotype, fertilization and their interactions on the amount of accumulated P in all parts of the plant and total plant were significant. The average of P content of the whole plant in the studied species indicates an increase of 4.2 times the amount of P absorbed by fertilizer application. In fertilization conditions, the lowest P content in plant parts and total plant was observed in two weed species, while under non- fertilization conditions, there was no significant difference between species in the plant parts. Alterations in P content in the studied species were due to changes in its determinant components, i.e. the amount of dry matter and P concentration. Although, both the amount of dry matter and P concentration in all parts of the plant significantly (P = 0.01) were influenced by the factors of the experiment, and in most of the cases, their interactions, the amount of alterations in the dry matter and as a result , its contribution to changes in the P content was more than the P concentration. The average of P content allocated to grain in all species was 54.3%, in the crop species was 64.1 and in the two weed species was 34.7, which shows a much higher allocation of P to the grains in the crop species.
Conclusion: This study showed that the accumulation of P, followed by P concentration and P allocation coefficients to different parts of the plant in physiological maturity stage were influenced by fertilization and genotype and the interactions of these two factors. Further alterations in P accumulation can be attributed to its dependence on variations in dry matter and P concentrations. The obtained results showed a small variation of the studied species in terms of P accumulation in low available P conditions compared to the conditions of fertilizer application as amount as recommended which is a sign of the similarity of these species in terms of tolerance to P deficiency as well as different response of species to P fertilizer application.

Keywords

Main Subjects


1.Akbari, F., Dahmardeh, M., Morshdi, A., Ghanbari, A. and Khoramdel, S. 2019. Effects of tillage system and plant residue on nitrogen uptake and use efficiency in corn and bean intercropping systems. J. Crop Improv. 20: 4. 785-799. (In Persian)
2.Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D. and Smith, M. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration. Guide lines for computing crop water requirements (Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56) Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
3.Bahrani, A. and Tahmasebi Sarvestani,Z. 2007. Effect of rate and times of nitrogen application on accumulation and remobilization efficiency of flag leaf in two wheat cultivars. J. Water Soil Sci.11: 40. 147-155. (In Persian)
4.Barati, V. and Ghadiri, H. 2016. Effects of drought stress and nitrogen fertilizer on yield, yield components and protein content of two barley cultivars. J. Crop Prod. Process. 6: 20. 191-207. (In Persian)
5.Barati, V. and Ghadiri, H. 2017. Assimilate and nitrogen remobilization of six-rowed and two-rowed winter barley under drought stress at different nitrogen fertilization. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci.63: 6. 841-855.
6.Barati, V., Ghadiri, H., Zand-Parsa, S. and Karimian, N. 2015. Nitrogen and water use efficiencies and yield response of barley cultivars under different irrigation and nitrogen regimes in a semi-arid mediterranean climate. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 61: 1. 15-32.
7.Ebrahimian, E., Koocheki, A., Nasiri Mahalati, M., Khorramdel, S. and Beheshti, A. 2016. Effects of tillage systems and residue application rate on nitrogen uptake and use efficiency in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Cereal Res. 6: 1. 79-88. (In Persian)
8.Emam, Y. 2007.Cereal production. Shiraz Univ. Press, 190p. (In Persian)
9.Ercoli, L., Lulli, L., Mariotti, M., Masoni, A. and Arduini, I. 2008. Post-anthesis dry matter and nitrogen dynamics in durum wheat as affected by nitrogen supply and soil water availability. Eur. J. Agron.28: 2. 138-147.
10.Khamadi, F., Mesgarbashi, M., Hosaibi, P., Enaiat, N. and Farzaneh, M. 2015. The effect of crop residue and nitrogen fertilizer levels on soil biological properties and nitrogen indices and redistribution of dry matter in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Appl Field Crop Res. 28: 4. 149-157. (In Persian)
11.Khodshenas, M.A., Ghadbeiklou, J. and Dadivar, M. 2015. The effects of source and rate of nitrogen fertilizer and irrigation on nitrogen uptake of silage corn and residual soil nitrate. J. Water. Soil. 29: 6. 1640-1650. (In Persian)
12.Khosravi, E. 2015. Azotobacter and its role in soil fertility management. Land Manag. J. 2: 2. 79-94. (In Persian)
13.Kiani, S., Siadat, S.A., Moradi Telavat, M.R., Abdali Mashhadi, A.R. and Sare, M. 2014. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer application on forage yield and quality of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and fennel (Foeniculum vulgare L.) intercropping. I. J. Crop Sci. 16: 2. 77-90. (In Persian)
14.Muurinen, S., Kleemola, J. and Peltonen-Sainio, P. 2007. Accumulation and translocation of nitrogen in spring cereal cultivars differing in nitrogen use efficiency. Agron. J. 99: 2. 441-449.
15.Niazi-ardakani, M., Barati, V., Bijanzadeh, E. and Behpoori, A. 2020. Effects of different nitrogen fertilizer sources and crop residues on yield and yield components of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under late season water stress conditions. Agro. Ecol. 12: 1. 107-126. (In Persian)
16.Rasmussen, P.E. and Rohde, C.R. 1991. Tillage, soil depth, and precipitation effects on wheat response to nitrogen. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55: 1. 121-124.
17.Rostami, M. and Ahmadi, A. 2014. Investigation the effect of nitrogen forms and split fertilization on grain yield and nitrogen content of twocorn hybrids. Appl Field Crop Res.27: 104. 40-46. (In Persian)
18.Sadeghi, H. 2007. Effects of crop residue and nitrogen rate on morpho-physiological traits, yield and yield components of two dry land wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Shiraz, Iran. (In Persian)
19.Sadeghi, H. and Kazemeini, S.A.R. 2015. Effect of crop residue management and nitrogen fertilizer on grain yield and yield components of two barley cultivars under dryland conditions. Iranian J. Crop Sci. 13: 3. 436-451. (In Persian)
20.Salvagiotti, F., Castellarín, J.M., Miralles, D.J. and Pedrol, H. M. 2009. Sulfur fertilization improves nitrogen use efficiency in wheat by increasing nitrogen uptake. Field Crop Res.113: 2. 170-177.
21.Sarig, S., Blum, A. and Okon, Y. 1988. Improvement of the water status and yield of field-grown grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) by inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense. J. Agr. Sci. 110: 2. 271-277.
22.Shahpari, F. and Fateh, E. 2016. Different residue type and management and nitrogen on yield and quality of durum wheat (Triticum durum L.). J Crop Prod. 9: 3. 87-104. (In Persian)
23.Xu, Z.Z., Yu, Z.W. and Wang, D. 2006. Nitrogen translocation in wheat plants under soil water deficit. Plant soil.
280: 1-2. 291-303.
24.Yang, J. and Zhang, J. 2006. Grain filling of cereals under soil drying. New Phytol. 16: 2. 223-236.
25.Zadoks, J.C., Chang, T.T. and Konzak, C.F. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res.
14: 6. 415-421.