In vitro mass propagation of ‘Myrobalan29c’ (prunus cerasifera L.): a vegetative Rootstock for stone fruits

Document Type : original paper

Authors

1 Faculty Member of Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University

2 fuculty, crop and horticultural science research department,khorasan razavi agricultural and natural resources research and education center ,AREEO, MASHHAD

Abstract

Background and objectives: The main purpose of the presented study was to investigate the techniques for in vitro propagation of Myrobalan29c (a rootstock for stone trees). In vitro propagation fruit tree is available way for the mass propagation. In vitro proliferation of woody plants has more problems than herbaceous plants. And woody plant for the in vitro regeneration adventitious shoot from the explant٫ and also in vitro rooting are hard. Therefore, the selection of suitable culture media is necessary for inanition regeneration of shoots from explants٫ proliferation and rooting for the development of a propagation system in fruit trees.

Material and methods: This study was performed to determine the best culture medium and plant growth regulators in micropropagation of Myrobalan 29C in a factorial experiment on a complete randomized design (CRD) with 4 replication where each plot contained 5 explants at the Natural Resource and Agricultural Research and Educational Centre of Khorasan Razavi. In order to the proliferation used performed, in level two of culture medium including (MS and QL) and concentrations BAP and TDZ in level five (0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 mgL-1) and two kinds of culture medium including QL and DKW plant growth regulators NAA with (0, 1, 2 and 3 mgL-1) in rooting step and in the acclimatization of substrate Coco pit and Perlite (50; 50 V). The number and the length of the shoots and number leaf in proliferation phase after subculture three (21 days between each subculture) and in rooting phase number and root length, leaf number, percent root and plantlets stem length evaluated.
Results: The results showed that the highest shoots proliferation ratio was obtained with 3.41 in MS medium containing 2 mgL-1 of BAP and also the highest plantlets lengths 2.5, 2.33 and 2.29 cm, respectively was observed in three concentrations of 1, 2 and 3 mgL-1 of BAP. The highest percentage of rooting (100%) and root length (2.12 cm) were recorded in DKW medium respectively at concentrations of 1 and 3 mgL-1 NAA. The acclimatization of plantlets to greenhouse conditions was successful. The highest rate of plantlets survival (about 50%) in DKW medium with concentrations 1 mgL-1 of NAA was obtained in substrate Coco peat and Perlite (50; 50 V).
Conclusion: The composition of the culture medium and the concentration of growth regulator effect on the proliferation and propagation stone rootstock .In this experiment, optimum BAP and NAA concentrations respectively was 2 and 1 mgL-1 for proliferation and rooting of Myrobalan29c. It should be noted that higher concentrations of 2 mgL-1 BAP and NAA are not recommended for this plant. Usually, root production is affected by the synthesis, metabolism and auxin movement in the plant. Therefore acclimatization directly related to rooting quality and the highest rooting ratie.

Keywords


1.Andreu, P. and Marin, J.A. 2005. In vitro culture establishment and multiplication of the prunus. Acta Hort. Pp: 15-20.
2.Channuntapipat, Ch., Sedgley, M. and Collins, G. 2003. Micropropagation of almond cultivars Nonpariel and Ne
Plus Ultra and the hybrid rootstock Titan × Nemagard. Sci. Hort. 98: 473-484.
3.Daneshvar Hossini, A., Ganji Moghadam, E. and Anahid, S. 2010. Effects of media cultures and plant growth regulators in micropropagation of Gisela6 rootstock. A. Bio. Res. 1: 135-141. (In Persian)
4.Demiral, S. and Ulger, S.A. 2008. Research on propagation of Gisela 5 cherry rootstock by tissue culture. Akd. Uni. Zir Fac. 21: 117-121.
5.Huang, V.J. 2003. In vitro propagation of dwarf cherry rootstock Gisela. J. Nat. Sci. 26: 2. 161-164.
6.Izad Panah, Sh. 2004. The effects of age and genotype on the way propagation Sweet Cherry (Prunus avium) in vitro. Nat. Sou. 64: 63-70. (In Persian)
7.Ganji Moghadam, E. and Abdollahzadeh, A. 2009. Guide fruit trees rootstock (Translate). AREEO. Pp: 155-184. (Edited book). (In Persian)
8.Ganji Moghadam, E., Bolandi, H.R.and Anahid, S. 2008. In vitro multiplication of four genotypes dwarf selected Mahalab. Res. Deve. Nat. Res. 79: 55-61. (In Persian)
9.Kamali, K., Majidi, A. and Zarghami,R. 2002. Determine the most suitable culture medium and growth conditions micropropagation of vegatative GF677 (hyberid Paech × Almound) rootstock.J. Sap. Seed. 17: 38-47. (In Persian)
10.Mahdavyan, M., Bozari, N. and Abdollahi, H. 2010. Effect of media and plant growth regulators on proliferation and rooting Mahaleb (Sent losi 64)of vegetative rootstock. J. Sap. Seed.1: 15-26. (In Persian)
11.Mohamed, A. 2012. Establishment of regeneration system for Taif peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) cultivar (Balady cultivar) in Taif, KSA. J. Am. Sci. 8: 4. 232-239.
12.Movsiuw, A. 2011. In vitro propagation of virus-free Myrobalan 29C rootstock. GRI. 7349: 101-102.
13.Perez-Tornero, O. and Lopez, J.M. 2000. Effect of basal media and growth regulators on the in vitro propagation
of apricot (prunus armenica L.) cv. Cannino. J. Hort. Sci. Bio. 75: 283-286.
14.Plopa, C., Dutu, N., Isac, V., Mazilu, C. and Ancu, S. 2010. Factors influencinrg in Vitro propagation of Myrobolan dwarf Plum root stock. ISHS. Acta. Hor. 966: 221-223.
15.Punchia, G. 1992. Research on in vitro propagation of Prunus laurecerasus cv. Otto Layken. Aca. Hort. 300: 177-186.
16.Ruzic, D., Saric, M., Cerovic, R. and Culafic, L. 2001. Change in macro element content of the media and in sweet cherry in mil GM 9 shoots during in vitro culture. J. Hort. Sci. Bio.78: 295-299.
17.Ruzic, D.V. and Vajovic, T.I. 2013. The effect of cytoknins types and their concentration on in vitro multiplication of sweet cherry. Hort. Sci. 35: 12-21.
18.Sedlak, J. and Paprstein, F. 2003. Influence of growth regulator on in vitro propagation of pyrus communis c.v. koporeka. Acta. Hort. 616: 379-382.
19.Shekafandeh, A. and Qasemi, M. 2008. Effects of BA and TDZ on bud growth and somatic embryogenesis of immature almond (Prunus dulcis L.) blooming late shahrody varieties 7. J. Hort. Sci.2: 148-152. (In Persian)
20.Soleymanpor, A. and Bozari, N. 2012. Effect of media and plant growth regulators in micro propagation Mahaleb (SL-64) of vegitative rootstock. STGI. 12: 1-5. 9. (In Persian)
21.Tatari, M. and Mosavi, A. 2013. Evaluation in vitro culture of vegetative Tetra, Nemagard and GF677 rootstock. Bu. Agric. 3: 103-115. (In Persian)  
22.Yadollahi, A., Nazari Moghadam Aghaee, R. and Moeeni, A. 2009. Effect composition BAP and NAA on prolifiration Gisela rootstock. STGI.3: 1-5. (In Persian)
23.Yang, H.Y. and Schmitid, H. 1994. Influnece of different auxin on in vitro sweet cherry cultivares. Agric. Sci.59: 1. 45-47.
24.Ying-Ning, Z. 2010. Micropropagation of chinese plum (Prunus salicina Lindl.) using mature stem segments. Not. Bot. Hort. Agric. Clu. 38: 3. 214-218.
25.Zolfaghari Nasab, R., Khosroshahi, M., Gergoryan, V. and Matlabi Azar, A. 2005. Study in vitro natural hybrid Apricot × Plum. J. Hort. Sci. Tec. I.5: 81-92. (In Persian)