Assessment of Yeild and Soybean Cultivars Response to Nepoviruses, and Possible Effect of Nepoviruses on Soybean Podding Disorder

Document Type : scientific research article

Authors

1 Corresponding Author, Researcher and Ph.D. in Plant Pathology, Dept. of Plant Protection, Golestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Gorgan, Iran.

2 Professor, Dept. of Plant Virus, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Soybean is a plant belonging to the Fabaceae family and is one of the most important oil seed in the world. The northern provinces of Iran are the main soybean cultivation regions in the country, but over the years, soybean podding disorder has reduced yield in this regions and caused up to 100% damage. The disorder is more severe in late planting farms, and symptoms can be observed as plant greening, accumulation of flowers and pods, abnormal pods, bud blight, and lack of seed in pod. The results of previous studies have shown the possible role of viruses in occurrence of soybean disorder. This research was conducted to investigate the Nepovirus effect on soybean yield and cultivars, and possible role on soybean podding disorder.
Materials and Methods: 770 soybean sample from Golestan provinces were collected befor and after disorder appeared, and tested by DAS-ELISA and RT-PCR test for investigate the possible role of Nepovirus in disorder. The response of soybean cultivars to Nepovirus and soybean podding disorder, was evaluated in greenhouse and natural conditions. In greenhouse, 2 soybean cultivars (Katol, Saman) were inoculated mechanically at the 4-6 leaf stage. For comparison of soybean cultivars response to studied viruses and evaluation of possible role of Nepovirus on soybean podding disorder in natural condition, the experiment was performed in Golestan Agricuitural Research center as a split plot design with three factors: using net, virus inoculation and soybean cultivars with 3 replications in two years. Nepoviruses inoculated on specific plots on soybean plants at 4-6 leaf stages. ELISA and RT-PCR tests were used to ensure the plants infection with inoculated viruses, and growth indices were measured at physiological growth stage. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA, and the means were compared with LSD test at 5% confidence level, using SPSS software version 16.0.
Results and Discussion: Comparing of viruse frequency in not disorder plants with podding disorder plants, did not show significant relationship between viruses and disorder incidence. In greenhouse, virus inoculation on soybean plants, caused chlorosis, stunt and systemic necrosis, but the typical symptoms of disorder such as severe falling of flowers, re-flowering, and plant greening did not show. In natural conditions, disorder was observed in all soybean cultivars, but disorder incidence was different among cultivars, and Williams variety showed less disorder in four treatments. The highest and lowest plant growth indices were observed in non-inoculation virus with use of net treatment and, virus inoculation with no use of net, respectively. Mechanical virus inoculation on different soybean cultivars, although reduced growth indices and soybeans yield, but had no significant effect on the podding disorder. In treatments with not controlling of sucker pests, the incidence of disorder was significantly higher than other treatments.
Conclusion: Virus inoculation on soybean plants in greenhouse and natural conditions did not cause podding disorder syndrome. Viruses in soybean plants, reduce growth indices and aggravate disorder due to the stress they inflict on the soybean plant, but are not probably the cause of the disorder alone. In treatments with not controlling of sucker pests, disorder incidence was significantly higher, so the role of sucker pests was estimated effective and important.

Keywords


1.FAO Agricultural Outlook. 2021. OECD Pub. https://doi.org/10.1787/19428846-en.
2.Faraji, A. and Raeesi, S. 2015. Soybean podding disorder. Agri Res, Edu and Ext Org (AREEO). 19p.
3.Cheraghali, A. 1990. Podding disorder of soybean. Final report of the research project. Agri. Res, Edu. Ext. Org. (AREEO). 54p.
4.Rahimian, H., Hamdolahzadeh, A. and Montazeri, M. 1995. Study of implication of prokaryote, virus and viroid organisms in soybean podding disorder. The 12th Iranian Plant Pathology Cong.
5.Afshari Azad, H. 2003. Investigation the role of soil microorganisms in the incidence of soybean pod disorder. Final report of the research project. Agri. Res. Edu. Ext. Org. (AREEO). 25p.
6.Golnaraghi, A.R., Shahraeen, N., Pourrahim, R., Farzadfar, S. and Ghasemi, A. 2004. Occurrence and relative incidence of viruses infecting soybeans in Iran. Plant DIS. 88: 1069-1074.
7.Shameli, S., Nasrollahnejad, S. and Hashemi, M. 2012. Infection status of soybean field to Tobacco Ring Spot Virus (TRSV) in Golestan province. J. Plant Prod. 19: 3. 27-38.
8.Almeida, A.M.R., Bergamin Filho, A. and Amorim, L. 1994. Disease progress of soybean bud blight and spatial pattern of diseased plants. J. Plant Dis. Prot.101: 386-392. 
9.Costa, A.S., Miyasaka, S. and d’Andrea Pinto, A.J. 1955. Queima dos brotos da soja, uma moléstia causada pelo vírus da necrose branca do fumo ou couve. Bragantia. 14: 7-10.
10.Rabedeaux, P.F., Gaska, J.M., Kurtzweil, N.C. and Grau, C.R. 2005. Seasonal progression and agronomic impact of Tobacco Streak Virus on soybean in Wisconsin. Plant DIS.89: 391-396.
11.Derrick, K.S. 1984. Occurrence of a leafhopper-transmitted disease of soybeans in Louisiana. Plant DIS.68: 4. 343-344.
12.Hobbs, H.A., Hill, C.B., Grau, C.R., Koval, N.C., Wang, Y., Pedersen, W.L., Domier, L.L. and Hartman, G.L. 2006. Green stem disorder of soybean. Plant DIS. 90: 4. 513-518.
13.Sharman, M. 2016. Phytoplasma and virus problems in soybean and mungbean crops. Insect Pest Management for Australia’s Northen Region. https://thebeatsheet.com.au.
14.Bashir, A., Ahmad, Z. and Murata, N. 2000. Seed-borne viruses: detection, identification and control. Agha Jee printer. Pakistan. 156p.
15.Nasrollahnejad, S. and Shameli, S. 2015. Serological detection and host rang of Tobacco Streak Ilarvirus in Golestan province. J. Plant Prod. 22: 59-71.
16.Clark, M.F. and Adams, S.A.N. 1977. Characteristics of micro plate’s method of enzyme-linked-immunosorbent assay for detection of plant viruses. J. Gen. Virol. 34: 475-483.
17.Wei, T. and Clover, G. 2008. Use of primers with 5' non-complementary sequences in RT-PCR for the detection of nepovirus subgroups A and B. J. Virol Methods. 153: 16-21. 
18.Shameli, S., Nasrollahnejad, S. and Hashemi, M. 2012. Infection status of soybean field to Tobacco Ring Spot Virus (TRSV) in Golestan province.J. Plant Prod. 19: 3. 27-38.
19.Shameli, S., Rakhshandehroo, F., Safarnejad, M.R. and Ramezanpoor, S.S. 2019. Effect of Tobacco Streak Virus on podding of differentsoybean cultivars under greenhouse conditions. Appl. Entomol. Phytopathol. 86: 2. 133-145.  
20.Miransari, M. 2015. Abiotic and biotic stresses in soybean production: soybean production. Academic press.
21.Jadhav Pravin, V., Mane, S.S., Nandanwar, R.S., Kale, P.B., Dudhare, M.S. and Moharil, M.P. 2015. Floral bud distortion in soybean and incidence in Central India. Egypt. J. Biol. 15: 59-65.
22.Subekti, N.A. 2008. The effects of disease on plant reproduction as basis for breeding for disease resistance. PEI PFI XIX South Sulawesi. 5: 167-80.
23.Marr, D.L. and Marshall, M.L.2006. The role of fungal pathogensin flower size and seed mass variationin three species of Hydrophyllum (Hydrophyllaceae). Am. J. Bot.93: 3. 389-98.
24.Pracros, P., Renaudin, J., Eveillard, S., Mouras, A. and Hernould, M. 2006. Tomato flower abnormalities induced by stolbur phytoplasma infection are associated with changes of expression of floral development genes. Mol. Plant Microbe Inter. 19: 1. 62-8.
25.Singh, A.K. and Bhatt, B.P. 2013. Occurrence of phytoplasma phyllody and witches' broom disease of faba bean in Bihar. J. Environ. Biol. 34: 5. 837.
26.Moini, A.A. 2003. Identification of some pathogenic pathogens viruses of soybeans and their possible relation with podding disorder with emphasis on Tospoviruses. Final report of the research project. Agri. Res. Edu. Ext. Org. (AREEO). 31p.