Evaluation the effects of different sources of nitrogen on agro-meteorological indices and sources use efficiency in potato Abstract

Document Type : scientific research article

Authors

1 Corresponding Author, Associate Prof., Seed and Plant Research Improvement Department, Khuzestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Ahwaz, Iran.

2 Assistant Prof., Soil and Water Research Department, Khouzestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center AREEO, Ahwaz, Iran

3 Assistant Prof., Soil and Water Research Department, Khuzestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Ahwaz, Iran

Abstract

Background and objective: Growing degree days (GDD) and helio thermal units (HTU) are the temperature based agro-meteorological indices that play important role in predicting crop growth and yield. The efficiency of conversion of heat and radiation energy to dry matter depends on genetics factors, planting date and crop. Heat summation units (HSU), that mainly called growing degree days, and its derivations such as helio thermal units, heat use efficiency and helio thermal units use efficiency are the most necessary to determine phenological stages and the suitable planting dates for cultivars of different crops. There is little information concerning the effects of different sources of nitrogen on agro-metorological indices and sources use efficiency for potato in the sub-tropic regions. This experiment was undertaken to define the effects of different sources of nitrogen on agro-meteorological indices in phonological stages and sources use efficiency in two potato cultivars (Sante and Savalan).

Material and method This study was conducted in a factorial arrangement as two factors in a randomized complete block design with three replications at Behbahan Agriculture Research Stations. Factor (A) was nitrogen sources: nitrogen fertilizer lack, plots that received 50% nitrogen from mineral fertilizer Plus 50% nitrogen from vermicompost (50% M+50%V), plots that received 75% nitrogen from mineral fertilizer Plus 25% nitrogen from vermicompost (75% M+25%V), and plots that obtained 100% nitrogen from mineral fertilizer (100% M). Factor (B) was potato cultivars (Sante and Savalan). Sprouted seed tubers were planted at early January. One week before harvesting haulms were defoliated and tubers harvested at mid -May. Growing degree days, helio thermal untis were calculated in all phonological stages, and after harvesting thermal use efficiency and helio thermal unit use efficiency determined. Data were statistically analyzed by SPSS software. Significant differences among treatments means were determined at P≤0.05 by Duncan’s multiple test range.

Results: The duration, growing degree days and helio thermal units of sprout development stage were significantly lower in Savalan than Sante cultivar. The effects of different sources of nitrogen on duration, growing degree days and helio thermal units in sprout development stage were not significant. The duration of vegetative stage was 15 days in all studied treatmrnts. Early exposure of plants to favorable climatic conditions for tuber initiation, short day and cool night temperature, caused the duration of vegetative growth, growing degree days and helio thermal units were low in this phonological stage. Due to high temperature at late April and early May growing degree days and helio thermal units in tuber bulking stage were considerable higher than previous stages. Maturation was not observed in this research. Yield, thermal use efficiency, helio thermal units use efficiency and nitrogen use efficiency were significant higher in Savalan cultivar as compared with Sante. Application of vermicompost in 50% M+%50V and 75% M+25%V lead to increase yield, thermal use efficiency, helio thermal units use efficiency and nitrogen use efficiency in these treatments in comparison with application of only mineral fertilizer (100% M).

Conclusion: 75% M+25%V treatment is recommended for cultivation of Savalan and Sante cultivars.

Keywords

Main Subjects


1.Charalampopoulos, I. (2021). Agrometeorological Conditions and agroclimatic trends for the maize and wheat crops in the Balkan region. Atmosphere. 12 (671), 1-24.
2.Vatca, S. D., Stoian, V.A., Man, T. S., Horvath, C., Vidican, R., Gadea, T., Vatca, A., Rotaru, A., Varban, R., Cristina, M., & Stoian, V. (2021). Agrometeorological requirements of maize crop phenology for sustainable cropping-A historical review for Romania. Sustainability, 13, 7719, 1-14.
3.Gupta, V., Gupta, M., Kour, S., & Sandhu, S. S. (2020). Agromet indices and response of varieties of wheat (Triticum aestvium) to sowing environments and nitrogen levels under irrigated lower hills of North-West plains of Shiwaliks. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 66 (1), 25-32.
4.Samantaray, S., Mahanty, M., Priyadarshini, A., Mohapatra, A. K. B., Rath, B. S., & Nanda, A. (2022). Agro-meteorological indices and heat units of rice varieties under different dates of planting in east and southeastern coastal plain zone of Odisha. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 11 (10), 527-531.
5.Darabi, A. (2023). Comparison of agro-meteorological indices and yield of onion cultivars in Behbahan, southwest Iran. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 13 (3), 1-15. [In Persian]
6.Darabi, A., & Omidvari, S. H. (2020). Effect of planting date on agro-meteorological indices at different phonological Stages of potato cultivars. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 18, 323-339.
7.Kumar, M., Naushad Khan, N., Ravindra Sachan, R., Shravan Kumar Maurya, S. K., & Durgesh Kumar Maurya, D. K. (2023). Effect of thermal unit and heat use efficiency at various phenophases of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 15 (3), 583-588.
8.Sreeniavas, G., Devender Redady, M.,    & Raji Redady, D. (2010). Agro-meteorological indices in relation to phenology of aerobic rice. Journal of Agrometeorological, 12 (2), 241-244.
9.Devi, S., Singh, M., & Aggarwal, R. K. (2019). Thermal requirements and heat use efficiency of pea cultivars under varying environments. Current World Environment, 14 (3), 376-382.
10.Souri, M. K., Rashidi, M., & Kianmehr, M. H. (2018). Effects of manure-based urea pellets on growth, yield, and nitrate content in coriander, garden cress, and parsley plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 41 (11), 1405-1413.
11.Jalali, A. H. (2022). The effect of nitrogen fertilizer and nitrogen splitting on yield and nitrate content of potato tubers.  Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 20 (2), 137-146. [In Persian]
12.Pobereżny, J., Wszelaczyńska, E., Wichrowska, D., & Jaskulski, D. (2015). Content of nitrates in potato tubers depending on the organic matter, soil fertilizer, cultivation simplifications applied and storage. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 75 (1), 42-49.
13.Rehman, S. U., Federica, F. D., Alessio Aprile, A., Michele Benedetti, M., & Francesco Paolo Fanizzi, F. P. (2023). Vermicompost: Enhancing plant growth and combating abiotic and biotic stress. Agronomy, 13 (1134), 1-25.
14.Malakouti, M. J., & Tehrani, M. M. (1999). The Role of micronutrients in increasing yield and quality of agricultural crops. Tarbiat Modarres University Publication. Tehran. [In Persian]
15.Tolessa, E. S. (2019). A review on water and nitrogen use efficiency of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in relation to its yield and yield components. Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 4 (2), 119-132.
16.Keisham, A., Heisnam, P., Moirangthem, A., Das, T., Singh, N. I., & Singh, L. N. (2015). Effect on growth and yield of potato (Solanum tubersum L.) var. Kufri Jyoti by nitrogen integration with different organic sources and itsafter effect on soil. The Bioscan, 10 (13), 1335-1338.
17.Darabi, A. (2017). Study on the agro-meteorological indices at different phenological stages and growth analysis of new potato genotypes. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology, 18 (3), 271-286. [In Persian]
18.Maji, S., Bhowmick, M., Chakraborty, P., Jena, S., Dutta, S. K., Nath, R., Bandyopahyay, P., & Chakraborty, P. K. (2014). Impact of agro-meteorological on growth and productivity of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in Eastern India. Journal of Crop and Weed, 10 (2), 193-189.
19.Parvizi, K., Souri, J., & Mahmoodi, R. (2011). Evaluation of cultivation date on yield and amount of tuber disorders of potato cultivars in Hamadan province. Journal of Horticultural Science,25 (1), 82-93. [In Persian]
20.Mihovilovich, E., Carli, C., de Mendiburu, F., Hualla, V., & Bonierbale, M. (2009). Protocol tuber bulking maturity assessment of elite and advanced potato clones. International Potato Center. 18 p.
21.Kazemi, M., Hassanabadi, H., & Tavakoli, H. (2011). Potato production management. Nashr-e-Amozesh and Tarvij Keshavarzi, Tehran. [In Persian]
22.Loyla Rodríguez, P., Danny Sanjuanelo, C., Carlos Eduardo Ñústez, L., & Patricia Moreno-Fonseca, L. (2016). Growth and phenology of three Andean potato varieties (Solanum tuberosum L.) under water stress. Agronomía Colombiana, 34 (2), 141-154.
23.Darabi, A. (2019). The investigation of planting season effect on yield and phenology of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) culivars using thermal indices. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 9 (1), 65-77. [In Persian]
24.Shubham Pandey, S., Dwivedi D. K., Vikram Bharati, V., Kumar, A., Harendra Singh, H., & Anshuman Dwivedi, A. (2022). Effect of different levels and sources of nitrogen on growth and yield of Potato (Solanum-tuberosum L.). The Pharma Innovation Journal, 11 (7), 3719-3722.
25.Hoseini, S. S., Majidian, M., & Esfahani, M. (2022). Effect of nitrogen fertilizer vermicompost application onagronomic characteristics, seed yield and quality of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Applied Research in Field Crops, 34 (4), 74-97. [In Persian]
26.Getahun, B. B., Kassie, M. M., Visser, R. G. F., & Linden, C. G. V. D. (2020). Genetic diversity of potato cultivars for nitrogenuse efficiency under contrasting nitrogen regimes. Potato Research, 63, 267-290.
27.Broz, A. P., Verma, P. O., & Appel, C. (2016). Nitrogen dynamics of vermicompost use in sustainable agriculture. Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management, 7 (11), 173-183.