Investigation of some physiological properties and performance of rapeseed oil under application of zeolite and ammonium sulphate fertilizer

Document Type : scientific research article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student of Soil Science, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran.

2 Corresponding Author, Professor, Dept. of Soil Sciences, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran.

3 Associate Prof., Dept. of Soil Sciences, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Nitrogen (N), as an essential nutrient for growth and development of plants, is added to agricultural fields to boost crop yield. Soil inorganic amendments such as zeolite are good strategies to improve soil quality and increase soil nitrogen content. The objective of this research was conducted with the aim of determine the impact of zeolite and ammonium sulphate fertilizer on physiological characteristics and yield in two soils with different texture.

Materials and Methods: This experiment was conducted as a split plot in pots conditions in three replicates in Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University in 2022. In this experiment, the main factors include two types of soils (silty clay loam and sandy loam) and the secondary factors in twelve levels include the control, 108 and 153 mg kg-1 ammonium sulphate fertilizer, 2, 4 and 6 g zeolite with 108 mg. kg ammonium sulphate, 2, 4 and 6 g zeolite with 153 mg kg-1 ammonium sulphate and 2, 4 and 6 g enriched zeolite were considered. The amount of ammonium sulfate fertilizer was determined according to the soil test and zeolite was enriched by ion saturation method. Data analysis was done in the Statistic software and the mean comparisons were made by LSD test.

Results: The results showed that the effects of the soil type treatments were significant on pod weight, protein grain and grain yield and the effects of the amendment treatments were significant on all studied traits. the interaction effect of soil type and amendment treatments were significant on biological yield, harvest index, oil yield and grain yield. 4 g zeolite with 153 mg kg-1 ammonium sulphate (T7) was the most effective treatment on pod weight and leaf chlorophyll content. The highest amount of plant height and protein grain was observed in 6 g zeolite with 153 mg kg-1 ammonium sulphate (T8) and 153 mg kg-1 ammonium sulphate (T2) respectively. The highest amount of biological yield and grain yield was observed in silty clay loam soil and 6 g zeolite with 153 mg kg-1 ammonium sulphate (T8). the most effective treatment on harvest index was silty clay loam soil and 108 mg kg-1 ammonium sulphate (T2) and the highest amount of oil yield was observed in silty clay loam soil and 2 g zeolite with 153 mg kg-1 ammonium sulphate (T6).

Conclusion: According to the results of the present study, all studied traits in soil with silty clay loam texture are more than soil with sandy loam texture. The best results were obtained in 6 g zeolite with 153 mg. kg ammonium sulphate (T8) and among the enriched zeolite treatments, application of 6 gr enriched zeolite with ammonium was the most effective treatment. It can be concluded that the combined use of zeolite and ammonium sulphate can be a suitable solution for improving rapeseed yield.

Keywords

Main Subjects


1.Rigby, D., & Caceres, D. (2001). Organic farming and the sustainability of agricultural systems. Agricultural Systems, 68, 21-40. doi: 10.1016/S0308-521X(00)00060-3.
2.Bagheri, H., Farahvash, F., Sam Daliri, M., Yarnia, M., & Shirani Rad, A. H. (2015). Investigation of the application of zeolite and manganese on yield, oil content and glucosinolate of rapeseed cultivars in different irrigation regimes. Journal of Plant Ecophysiology, 23(7), 44-29. dor: 20.1001.1.20085958. 1394.7.23.3.9. [In Persian]
3.Brevik, E., Cerda, A., Mataix-Solera, J., Pereg, L., Quinton, J., Six, J., & Oost, K. (2015). The interdisciplinary nature of soil. Soil, 1, 117-129. doi: 10.5194/soil-1-117-2015.
4.Beyki A., & Khashei Siuki A. (2019). Application of clinoptilolite natural zeolite and irrigation management on yield and yield components of black cumin plant (Nigella sativa L.). Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 33(1), 137-149. doi:10.22092/jwra. 2019.119120.
5.Sahari, M., Feyz Asl, A., & Valizadeh, G. R. (2009). Investigation of the effect of urea foliar application time on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of Sardari wheat in rainfed conditions. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3(52), 2011-1998. [In Persian]
6.Mihok, F., Macko, J., Orinak, A., Orinaková, R., Koval, K., Sisakova, K., Petrus, O., & Kostecka, Z. (2020). Controlled nitrogen release fertilizer based on zeolite clinoptilolite: Study of preparation process and release properties using molecular dynamics. Current Research in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 3, 100030. doi. org/10.1016/ j.crgsc.2020.100030.
7.Jarosz, R., Szerement, J., Gondek, K., & Mierzwa-Hersztek, M. (2022). The use of zeolites as an addition to fertilisers–A review. Catena, 213, 106125. doi. 10. 1016/j.catena.2022.106125.
8.Gan, Y., Malhi, S. S., Brandt, S., Katepa-Mupondwa, F., & Stevenson, C. (2011). Nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen uptake of Jancea canola under diverse environments. Agronomy Journal, 100, 285-295. doi: 10.2134/agrojnl2007. 0229.
9.Karimi, S., Hadi, H., Tajbaksh, M., & Modarres-Sanavy, S. A. M. (2020). Effect of zeolite on nitrogen use efficiency and physiological and biomass traits of amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) under water-deficit stress conditions. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 20, 1427-1441. doi: 10.1007/ s42729-020-00223-z.
10.Doni, S., Gispert, M., Peruzzi, E., Macci, C., Mattii, G. B., Manzi, D., Masini, C. M., & Grazia, M. (2020). Impact of natural zeolite on chemical and biochemical properties of vineyard soils. Soil Use and Management, 37(4), 832-842. doi:10.1111/sum.12665.
11.Mottaghi, S., Mottaghi, L., Shiranirad, A., & Lotfifar, O. (2019). Study the efficiency of zeolite in reduce the effect of drought stress on agronomical traits and seed yield of rapeseed in Karaj region. Plant Ecology, 11(36), 256-271. doi.20.1001.1.20085958.1398.11.36.22.2.
12.Latifah, O., Ahmed, O. H., & Majid, N. M. A. (2017). Enhancing nitrogen availability from urea using clinoptilolite zeolite. Geoderma, 306, 152-159. doi. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.07.012.
13.Flajsman, M., Mihelic, R., Kolmanic, A., & Acko, D.K. (2020). Influence of soil amended with zeolite and/or mineral N on agronomic performance and soil mineral N dynamics in a soybean–winter triticale crop rotation field experiment. Cereal Research Communication, 48, 239-246. doi: 10.1007/s42976-020-00030-3.
14.Noori, M., Zendehdel, M., & Ahmadi, A. (2006). Using natural zeolite for the improvement of soil salinity and crop yield. Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry, 88, 77-84. doi: 10.1080/ 02772240500457928.
15.Polat, E., Karaca, M., Demir, H., & Onus, A. N. (2004). Use of natural zeolite (clinoptilolite) in agriculture. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research, 12(1), 183-189.
16.Ravali, C. H., Rao, K. J., Anjaiah, T., & Suresh, K. (2020). Influence of zeolite on nitrogen fractions, nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen uptake of maize. International Research Journal of Pure and Applied Chemistry, 2, 297-307. doi. 10.9734/irjpac/2020/v21i2330327.
17.Day, P. R. (1965). Particle fractionation and particle size analysis. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Properties, Including Statistics of Measurement and Sampling, 9, 545-567.
18.Nelson, D. W., & Sommers, L. E. (1982). Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In A. L Page (ed). Method of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2nd ed. Madison, Wisconsin. American Society of Agronomy,
539-579.
19.Sparks, D. L., Page, A. L., Helmke, P. A., & Loeppert, R. H. (1996). Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3 Chemical Methods. SSSA Book Series. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. 1390 P.
20.Bremner, J. M., & Mulvaney, C. S. (1982). Nitrogen-total. P 595-624. In: R. H. Miller and D. R. Keeney (eds), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2, Chemical Analysis, American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin.
21.Olsen, S. R., & Sommers, L. E. (1982). Phosphorus. P 403–30, In: R. H. Miller and D. R. Keeney (eds), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties, American Society of Agronomy, Madison.
22.Helmke, P. A., & Sparks, D. L. (1996). Lithium, Sodium, Potassium and Rubidium. P. 551-574. In: D. L. Sparks et al. (ed) Methods of soil analysis, Part 3. ASA-SSA, Madison, WI., USA.
23.Park, M., & Komarneni, S. (1998). Ammonium nitrate occlusion vs. nitrate ion exchange in natural zeolites. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 62, 1455-1459.
24.Ozturk, O. (2010). Effects of source and rate of nitrogen fertilizer on yield, yield components and quality of winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Chilean Journal of Agriculture Research, 70(1), 132-141. doi: 10.4067/S0718-58392010000100014.
25.Dastbaz, N., Ali Mohammadi, M., Karimi, A., & Salavati, S. (2023). Impact of zeolite and nitrogen application on nitrogen use efficiency, growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.). Agricultural Engineering, 45(4), 391-408. doi.10.22055/agen.2023. 43010.1655. [In Persian]
26.Seyedi, M., & Hamzei, J. (2022). Evaluation of rapeseed growth and yield under nitrogen fertilizer in rotation with corn and chickpea. Journal of Plant Production Research, 28(1), 81-91. doi:10.22069/jopp.2020.17248.2590. [In Persian]
27.Rezvani, R., & Kafi, M. (2024). The effect of irrigation interval and different doses of zeolite on the growth and yield indices on white bean (Phaseolus lanatus L.). Iranian Journal of Pulses Research, 15(1), 75-91. doi:10.22067/ ijpr.2024.85616.1076.
28.Zamani Nouri, A., Qashqai, A., & Hosseini Abri, S. (2014). Effect of zeolite on yield, yield components and protein content of red bean plant. The first national conference on sustainable agricultural development with the application of agricultural model, February 12. 2014. Islamic Azad University, Saveh branch, iran.
29.Fahim, M., Gharineh, M. H., & Bakhshandeh, A. (2019). Investigating the effect of different levels of nitrogen on oil and nitrogen traits of three rapeseed cultivars under early planting conditions in Khuzestan province, Journal of Contemporary Research Science and Research, 1(2), 43-53. [In Persian]
30.Behdarvandan, A., Soleimani, Y., & Alavi Fazel, M. (2022). Effect of Nitrogen and Zinc Sulfate Fertilizers on Yield and Yield Components of Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.). Sustainable Agricultural Science Research, 1(4), 64-76. doi:10.30495/sarj.2022. 1952124.1066. [In Persian]
31.Zubkova, T. N., Vinogradov, D. V., & Dubrovina, O. A. (2022). Effect of zeolite on the micro-morphological and biochemical features of the spring rapeseed. Sabrao Journal of Breeding and Genetics, 54(1), 153-164. doi. 10.54910/sabrao2022.54.1.14.
32.Yu, X., & Li, B. (2019). Release mechanism of a novel slow release nitrogen fertilizer. Particuol. 4, 124-130. doi:10.1016/j.partic.2018.09.005.
33.Shabouti, M., Banisaidi, A., & Modhaj A. (2022). Study the response of bread wheat (Triticum eastivum L.) cultivars to seeding rate and different amounts of nitrogen. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Plant Production, 12(2), 140-158. [In Persian]
34.Zhao, D., Cao, Z., Chen, L., Zhan, G., Zhu, Y., & Han, J. (2023). Optimizing the effect of nitrogen on winter oilseed rape grain yield in china: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Agronomy, 144, 126755. doi.org/10. 1016/j.eja.2023.126755.