Insights into the Physiological Characteristics of Cow-Pea - Maize in Intercropping System Exploring the Role of Mycorrhiza and Phosphorus Fertilizer

Document Type : scientific research article

Authors

1 Ph.D. of Student of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran.

2 Corresponding Author, Dept. of Agriculture and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran.

Abstract

Abstract

Background and objectives: The use of biofertilizers, such as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), in intercropping systems has emerged as an innovative and sustainable approach to enhance crop growth and promote sustainable production. This study was conducted to investigate the effects of mycorrhizal biofertilizer and mineral phosphorus fertilizer on some physiological traits of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and maize (Zea mays) in an intercropping system using the replacement method.

Materials and methods: The experiment was carried out at two locations (the research farms of Shahrood University of Technology located in the Faculty of Agriculture and the Tarud research farm) as a factorial experiment in a completely randomized block design with three replications. The treatments included different cropping arrangements (pure cowpea, 75% cowpea + 25% maize, 50% cowpea + 50% maize, 25% cowpea + 75% maize, and pure maize) as the first factor; phosphorus fertilizer at three levels (0, 50, and 100 kg/ha) as the second factor; and mycorrhiza at two levels (application and no application) as the third factor.

Results: The results showed that the highest grain yield in cowpea plants (13.95 tons per hectare) and maize (6.2 tons per hectare) was observed in the treatment using mycorrhizal biofertilizer and 50 kilograms per hectare of phosphorus fertilizer in the Shahroud farm. The highest protein content, averaging 25.4%, in cowpea plants was achieved with the inoculation of mycorrhiza, 50 kilograms per hectare of phosphorus, and 100% cowpea planting in the Shahroud farm. All individual effects of the treatments significantly influenced the pigment content in cowpea. The highest chlorophyll content in cowpea (2.88 mg/g) and maize (3.8 mg/g) was observed in the 50% planting arrangement with the application of 50 kilograms per hectare phosphorus fertilizer. The highest carotenoid content in cowpea (3.56 mg/g) and maize (4.02 mg/g) was recorded at a 50% cowpea-maize planting ratio combined with 50 kilograms per hectare phosphorus application and the use of mycorrhiza in the Tarood region. The highest leaf area index in both plants increased by about 27% in the 50% planting arrangement compared to pure cropping. The highest land equivalent ratio, averaging 1.72, was obtained in the 75% maize and 25% cowpea planting treatment with 50 kilograms per hectare phosphorus fertilizer and mycorrhizal fungus application.

Conclusion: According to the results of this study, the mixed cropping system with the use of phosphorus fertilizer and mycorrhiza positively affected the physiological traits of cowpea and maize and can be recommended as a cropping model for agricultural producers.

Keywords

Main Subjects


1.Haripo, T. T., Makuvaro, V., Madanzi, T., & Sakadzo, N. (2023). Effect of plant population and row orientation on crop yield under sorghum-cowpea intercropping systems in semi-arid Zimbabwe. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences. 7(1), 41-48.‏
2.Pernet, C. A., & Ribi Forclaz, A. (2019). Revisiting the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO): international histories of agri-culture, nutrition, and development. The International History Review. 41(2), 345-350.
3.Panzeri, D., Guidi Nissim, W., Labra, M., & Grassi, F. (2022). Revisiting the Domestication Process of African Vigna Species (Fabaceae): Background, Perspectives and Challenges. Plants (Basel). 16; 11(4):532.
4.El-Shamy, M., Tamer, E. G., Sayed, M. R. S., & El-Sanosy, H. (2022). Evaluating the efficiency of intercropping systems for three maize hybrids with cowpea on yield productivity and net profit. Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research. 11(04), 1050-1063.‏
5.Mohamed Ahmed, I. A., Al Juhaimi, F., & Özcan, M. M. (2021). Insights into the nutritional value and bioactive properties of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa): Past, present and future prospective. International Journal of Food Science & Technology. 56(8), 3726-3741.‏
6.Yin, X., Song, Z., Shi, S., Bai, Z., Jiang, Y., Zheng, A., ... & Chen, F. (2024). Developments and prospects of multiple cropping in China. Farming System. 2(2), 100083.‏
7.Kyei-Boahen, S., Savala, CEN., Chikoye, D ,& Abaidoo, R. (2017). Growth and Yield Responses of Cowpea to Inoculation and Phosphorus Fertilization in Different Environments. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 646.
8.Islam, M. R., Sarker, U., Azam, M. G., Hossain, J., Alam, M. A., Ullah, R., & Islam, M. S. (2024). Potassium augments growth, yield, nutrient content, and drought tolerance in mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek.). Scientific Reports, 14(1), 9378.‏
9.Timofeeva, A., Galyamova, M., & Sedykh, S. (2022). Prospects for using phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms as natural fertilizers in agriculture. Plants. 11(16), 2119.‏
10.Wei-ge, H. U. O., Xiao-fen, C. H. A. I., Xi-he, W. A. N. G., William-David, O. R., Arjun, K. A. F. L. E., & Gu, F. E. N. G. (2022).  Indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi play a role in phosphorus depletion in organic manure amended high fertility soil. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 21,(10), 3051-3066.
11.Amani Machiani, M., Javanmard, A., Habibi Machiani, R., & Sadeghpour, A. (2022). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and changes in primary and secondary metabolites. Plants. 11(17), 2183.
12.El-Sawah, A. M., El-Keblawy, A., Ali, D. F. I., Ibrahim, H. M., El-Sheikh, M. A., Sharma, A., ... & Sheteiwy, M. S. (2021). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria enhance soil key enzymes, plant growth, seed yield, and qualitative attributes of guar. Agriculture. 11(3), 194.‏
13.Amonsou, E. O., Taylor, J. R., Beukes, M., & Minnaar, A. (2012). Composition of marama bean protein. Food Chemistry, 130(3), 638-643.‏
14.Shin, Y K., Bhandari, R. R., Jo, J. S., Song, J. W., Cho, M. C., Yang, E. Y., & Lee, J. G. (2020). Response to Salt Stress in Lettuce: Changes in Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters, Phytochemical Contents and Antioxidant Activities. Agronomy, 10(11), 1627.
15.Rezaei Chianeh, E., Khorramdel, S., & Garachali, P. (2015). Evaluation of relay intercropping of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) and faba bean (Vicia faba L.) on their yield and land use efficiency. Agriculture Crop Management, 17(1), 183-196.
16.Philips, J., & Hayman, D. (1970). Improved procedures for cleaning roots and staining parasitic and vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Journal of Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 55, 158-161.
17.Qin, Y., Yan, Y., Cheng, L., Lu, Y., Chen, J., Liu, F., & Tan, J. (2023). Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Rhizobium Facilitate Nitrogen and Phosphate Availability in Soybean/Maize Intercropping Systems. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 23(2), 2723-2731.‏
18.Etesami, H., Jeong, B. R., & Glick, B. R. (2021). Contribution of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi, Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria, and Silicon to P Uptake by Plant. Front Plant Science, 1,12, 699618.
19.Wahab, A., Muhammad, M., Munir, A., Abdi, G., Zaman, W., Ayaz, A., Khizar, C., & Reddy, SPP. (2023). Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Regulating Growth, Enhancing Productivity, and Potentially Influencing Ecosystems under Abiotic and Biotic Stresses. Plants (Basel), 12(17), 3102.
20.Kaur, H., Singh, S., & Kumar, P. (2023). Reconditioning of plant metabolism by arbuscular mycorrhizal networks in cadmium contaminated soils: Recent perspectives. Microbiological Research, 268, 127293.
21.Glaze-Corcoran, S., Hashemi, M., Sadeghpour, A., Jahanzad, E., Afshar, R. K., Liu, X., & Herbert, S. J. (2020). Understanding intercropping to improve agricultural resiliency and environmental sustainability. Advances in agronomy, 162, 199-256.
22.Koca, Y. O. (2021). Determination of the forage yield and growth parameters of maize (Zea mays L.) with quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) intercropping at different plant mextures. Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 26(1), 44-53.
23.Li, M., & Cai, L. (2021). Biochar and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi play different roles in enabling maize to uptake phosphorus. Sustainability, 13(6), 3244.‏
24.Ren, A. T., Zhu, Y., Chen, Y. L., Ren, H. X., Li, J. Y., Abbott, L. K., & Xiong, Y. C. (2019). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus alters root-sourced signal (abscisic acid) for better drought acclimation in Zea mays L. seedlings. Environmental and Experi-mental Botany, 167, 103824.‏
25.Smith, S. E., Facelli, E., Pope, S., & Andrew Smith, F. (2010). Plant performance in stressful environments: interpreting new and established knowledge of the roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas. Plant and Soil, 326, 3-20.‏
26.Andrino, A., Guggenberger, G., Kernchen, S., Mikutta, R., Sauheitl, L., & Boy, J. (2021). Production of organic acids by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and their contribution in the mobilization of phosphorus bound to iron oxides. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 661842.‏
27.Battini, F., Cristani, C., Giovannetti, M., & Agnolucci, M. (2016). Multifunctionality and diversity of culturable bacterial commu-nities strictly associated with spores of the plant beneficial symbiont Rhizophagus intraradices. Microbiological Research, 183, 68-79.‏
28.Selvakumar, G., Krishnamoorthy, R., Kim, K., & Sa, T. M. (2016). Genetic diversity and association characters of bacteria isolated from arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal spore walls. PLoS One, 11(8), e0160356.
29.Hara, S., & Saito, M. (2016). Isolation of inositol hexaphosphate (IHP)-degrading bacteria from arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal hyphal compartments using a modified baiting method involving alginate beads containing IHP. Microbes and Envi-Ronments, 31(3), 234-243.‏
30.Kyei-Boahen, S., Savala, C. E., Chikoye, D., & Abaidoo, R. (2017). Growth and yield responses of cowpea to inoculation and phosphorus fertilization in different environments. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 646.‏
31.El-Shamy, M. A., El-Mansoury, M. A., El-Bialy, M. A., Helmy, M. H., & Hassan, A. F. (2021). Response of maize to different intercropping systems and different sowing dates of cowpea.‏ Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 36(1), 169-180.
32.Ghanbari, A., Dahmardeh, M., Siahsar, B. A., & Ramroudi, M. (2010). Effect of maize (Zea mays L.)-cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) intercropping on light distribution. soil temperature and soil moisture in arid environment.‏ Journal
of Food Agriculture & Environment,
8, 102-108.
33.Dahmardeh, M., Ghanbari, A., Syahsar, B. A., & Ramrodi, M. (2010). The role of intercropping maize (Zea mays L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) on yield and soil chemical properties. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(8), 631-636.
34.Mahdy, A. Y., & El-Said, M. A. A. (2017). Effect of intercropping and cutting date for guar on soybean yield. International Journal of Agriculture and Economic Development, 5(2), 82-102.‏
35.Zen El-Dein, A. A., Koriem, M. H., Alsubeie, M. S., Alsalmi, R. A., Masrahi, A. S., Al-Harbi, N. A., ... & Hefny, Y. A. (2022). Effect of mycorrhiza fungi, preceding crops, mineral and bio fertilizers on maize intercropping with cowpea. Agriculture, 12(11), 1934.‏
36.Vaziri, E., Dahmardeh, M., & Khammari, I. (2023). The Evaluation of Planting Direction on the Consumption of Resources and Soil Nutrients in Sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) and CowPea (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Intercropping, 81.‏
37.Brhane, G., Redae, M., Tekulu, N., Mokenen, D., Girmay, B., Fisseha, K., & Tekle, D. (2024). Enhancing the Production and Productivity of
Irrigable Land through Pre-extension Demonstration of Intercropping of Cowpea with Maize in the Case of the Central Zone of Tigray, Ethiopia. Asian Journal of Research and Review in Agriculture, 586-592.‏
38.Adebayo, A. K., Anjorin, F. B., Olanipekun, S. O., Aluko, O. A., & Adewumi, A. D. (2024). Performances of Maize Grown as Intercrop with Cowpea under Different Planting Patterns. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Managemen,
28(7), 2033-2040.
39.Khonde, P., Congo, R. D., Tshiabukole, K., Congo, R. D., Kankolongo, M., Congo, R. D., & Nkongolo, K. (2018). Evaluation of yield and competition indices for intercropped eight maize varieties, soybean and cowpea in the zone of savanna of South-West RD Congo. Open Access Library Journal, 5(01), 1.
40.Arif, M., Kumar, A., & Pourouchottamane, R. (2024). Intercropping of maize and cowpea for enhancing productivity, profitability and land use efficiency. Bangladesh Journal of Botany, 53(2), 235-242.‏
41.Kombat, R. K., Gyasi Santo, K., Atakora, K., & Khalid, A. A. (2024). Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.)-maize (Zea mays L.) intercropping and fertilizer application affected maize yield and yield components in Guinea Savannah agro-ecological zone of Ghana. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 70(1), 1-19.‏
42.Coulibaly, Y. N., Tondoh, E. J., Bonny, B. S., Neya, B. J., Koffi, K. K., & Bi, I. A. Z. (2024). Assessment of maize-cowpea intercropping response to row orientation in diverse agro-ecologies of Côte d'Ivoire. Discover Agriculture, 2(1), 23.‏
43.El-Shamy, M., Tamer, E. G., Sayed, M. R. S., & El-Sanosy, H. (2022). Evaluating the efficiency of intercropping systems for three maize hybrids with cowpea on yield productivity and net profit. Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research, 11(04), 1050-1063.‏
44.Mohanty, M. (2024). Nutrient Management in Maize and Cowpea Intercropping System: A Review. International Journal of Plant & Soil Scienc, 36(8), 508-517.‏
45.Kussie, B., Tadele, Y., & Asresie, A. (2024). Effect of maize (zea mays l.) and cowpea (vigna unguiculata l.) intercropping on agronomic performance, yield and nutritional values of maize and cowpea under supplementary irrigation. Heliyon,
10, 21, e39817.
46.Dimande, P., Arrobas, M., & Rodrigues, M. Â. (2024). Intercropped maize and cowpea increased the land equivalent ratio and enhanced crop access to more nitrogen and phosphorus compared to cultivation as sole crops. Sustainability, 16(4), 1440.‏
47.Justes, E., Bedoussac, L., Dordas, C., Frak, E., Louarn, G., Boudsocq, S., Journet, E.P., Lithourgidis, A., Pankou, C., & Zhang, C. (2021). The 4C approach as a way to understand species interactions determining intercropping productivity. Fronties Agricutural Science Engineering, 8, 387-399.
48.Abou Khadra, S. H., Shaimaa, A. E. B., Salah, E. A. T., & Dina, E. E. E. (2013). Effect of intercropping wheat with sugar beet on their productivity and land use. Journal of Agricultural Research, 39, 37-53.
49.Rahman, T., Liu, X., Hussain, S., Ahmed, S., Chen, G., Yang, F., & Yang, W. (2017). Water use efficiency and evapotranspiration in maize-soybean relay strip intercrop systems as affected by planting geometries. PloS one, 12(6), e0178332.