Effects of regulated deficit irrigation regime on vegetative and Pomological Characteristics and Yield of oli Olive Amphisis Cultivar.

Document Type : original paper

Authors

Horticulture Crops research Department, Kermanshah Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Kermanshah, Iran.

Abstract

Background and Objectives
Regulated deficit irrigation is an optimizing strategy under which crops are allowed to sustain some degree of water deficit and yield reduction. During regulated deficit irrigation the crop is exposed to certain level of water stress either during a particular period or throughout the growing season. The main objective deficit irrigation of is to increase water use efficiency (WUE) of the crop by eliminating irrigations that have little impact on yield, and to improve control of vegetative growth (improve fruit size and quality). The resulting yield reduction may be small compared with the benefits gained through diverting the saved water to irrigate other crops for which water would normally be insufficient under conventional irrigation practices. This study was aimed to investigate the effect of regulated deficit irrigation regime on vegetative and Pomological Characteristics and Yield of oil Olive Amphisis Cultivar in Field Condition.
Materials and methods
This experiment was conducted in Dallaho Olive Research Station located in Kermanshah province. An experiment was used based on a randomized complete block design with three replications. Adult oil olive Amphisis cultivar was used. six irrigation regimes including full irrigation (as control), regulated deficit irrigation (100% of full irrigation during growing season plus 25% irrigation during pit hardening, regulated deficit irrigation (100% of full irrigation during growing season plus 75% irrigation from Start pit hardening to Harvesting), regulated deficit irrigation (100% of full irrigation during growing season plus 25% irrigation during fruit verasion), 60% of full irrigation (continuous deficit irrigation) and no irrigation (Rainfed). To elevate the effect of irrigation regimes, some growth vegetative traits measured at the end of growth season including current-season shoot growth and diameter as well as some fruit traits including fruit and oil yield, fruit weight, fruit length and diameter, pulp fresh and dry weight, fruit moisture percent, pulp percent, dry and fresh oil content, Fruit and oil water use efficiency were measured.
Results
Obtained results showed that The highest fruit yield, oil yield, fruit weight, fruit diameter, pulp fresh and dry weight, pulp percent were observed at full irrigation and regulated deficit irrigation (100% of full irrigation during growing season plus 25% irrigation during pit hardening and regulated deficit irrigation (100% of full irrigation during growing season plus 25% irrigation during fruit verasion),but the lowest one found at Rainfed. Overall, the results showed that regulated deficit irrigation during fruit pit hardening and fruit verasion could increased water use efficiency, whitout reduce fruit yield, oil yield, fruit weight, fruit diameter, pulp fresh and dry weight.
Discussion
In the arid and semi arid as well as sub-tropical regions, water shortage is a normal phenomenon and seriously limits the agricultural potential. Therefore, under irrigation or rain-fed conditions, it is important for the available water to be used in the most efficient way. Regulated deficit irrigation is an optimizing strategy under which crops are allowed to sustain some degree of water deficit and yield reduction. During regulated deficit irrigation the crop is exposed to certain level of water stress either during a particular period or throughout the growing season. The main objective deficit irrigation of is to increase water use efficiency (WUE) of the crop by eliminating irrigations that have little impact on yield, and to improve control of vegetative growth
Conclusion
According to the results of this research, it can be concluded that that RDI during fruit pit hardening and fruit verasion could increased water use efficiency, whitout reduce fruit yield, oil yield, fruit weight, fruit diameter, pulp fresh and dry weight.

Keywords

Main Subjects


1.Arzani, K. and Arji, I. 2000. The effect of water stress and deficit irrigation on young potted olive cv. Local-Roghani Roodbar. Acta Hortic. 537: 879-885.
2.Bacelar, E.A., Santos, D.L., Moutinho- Pereira, J.M., Goncalves, B.C., Ferreira, H.F. and Correia, C.M. 2006. Immediate responses and adaptative strategies of three olive cultivars under contrasting water availability regimes: Changes on structure and chemical composition
of foliage and oxidative damage. Plant Sci. 170: 596-605.
3.Berenguer, M.M.J., Gratten, S., Conne, J., Polito, V. and Vossen, P. 2002. Optimizing olive oil production and quality through irrigation management, university of California cooperative Extension and UC Davis.cesonoma,ucdavis.edu/files/51774-pdf.
4.Boughalleb, F. and Mhamdi, M. 2011. Possible involvement of proline and the antioxidant defense systems in drought tolerance of three olive cultivars grown under increasing water deficit regimes. Agric. J. 6(6): 371-391.
5.Calatrava, J. and Franco, J.A. 2011. Using pruning residues as mulch: Analysis of its adoptionand process of diffusion in Southern Spain olive orchards. J. Environ. Manage. 92(3): 620-629.
6.Chai, Q., Gan, Y., Zhao, C., Xu, H.L., Waskom, R.M., Niu, Y. and Siddique, K.H.M. 2015.Regulated deficit irrigation for crop production under drought stress. A review. Agron.Sustain. Dev. 21p.
7.Chalmers, D.J., Burge, G., Jerie, P.H. and Mitchell, P.D. 1986.The mechanism of regulation of Bartlett Pear fruit and vegetative growth by irrigation withholding and regulated deficitirrigation. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 111(6): 904-907.
8.Correa-Tedesco, G., Rousseaux, M.C. and Searles, P.S. 2010. Plant growth and yield
responses in olive (Olea europaea L.) to different irrigation levels in an arid region of
Argentina. Agric. Water Manage. 97: 1829-1837.
9.Costa, J.M., Ortuno, M.F. and Chaves, M.M. 2007. Deficit irrigation as a strategy to savewater: Physiologyand potential application to horticulture. J. Integr Plant Biol. 49(10): 1421-1434.
10.Dell’Amico, J., Moriana, A., Corell, M., Giron, I.F., Morales, D., Torrecillas, A. and
Moreno, F. 2012. Low water stress conditions in table olive trees (Olea europaea L.) duringpit hardening produced a different response of fruit and leaf water relations. Agric. Water
Manage. 114: 11-17.
11.Elhami, B., Zaare-Nahandi, F. and Jahanbakhsh-Godehkahriz, S. 2015. Effect of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) on physiological and biological responses of olive (Olea europaea L.
cv.Conservolia) under water stress. Int. J. Biosci. 6(4): 148-156.
12.Fereres, E. and Soriano, M.A. 2007. Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. J.
Exp. Bot. 58: 147-159.
13.FAO. 2008. http//www.fao.org/nr/water/ETo.html. Accessed 27 November, 2014.
14.Giron, I.F., Corell, M., Galindo, A., Torrecillas, E., Morales, D., Dell’Amico, J., Torrecillas,
F., Moreno, A. and Moriana, A. 2015. Changes in the physiological response between leaves
and fruits during a moderate water stress in table olive trees. Agric. Water Manage., 148:
280-286.
15.I.O.O.C. 2002a. Methodology for the primary characterization of olive varieties. Project on
conservation, characterization, collection of Genetic Resources in olive.
16.I.O.O.C. 2002b. Methodology for the secondary characterization (agronomic, phonological,
pomological and oil quality) of olive varieties held in collection. Project on conservation,
characterization, collection of Genetic Resources in olive.
17.Iniesta, F., Testi, L., Orgaz, F. and Villalobos, F.J. 2009. The effects of regulated and
continuous deficit irrigation on the water use, growth and yield of olive trees. Eur. J. Agron.
30: 258-265.
18.Li, S.H., Huguet, J.G., Schoch, P.G. and Orlando, P. 1989. Response of peach tree growth
and cropping to soil water deficit at various phonological stages of fruit development. J.
Hortic. Sci. 64(5): 541-552.
19.Mezghani, M.A., Charfi, C.M., Gouiaa, M. and Labidi, F. 2012. Vegetative and reproductive
behaviour of some olive tree varieties (Olea europaea L.) under deficit irrigation regimes in
semi-arid conditions of Central Tunisia. Sci. Hortic. 146: 143-152.
20.Moriana, A., Perez-Lopez, D., Prietoc, M.H., Ramirez-Santa-Pau, M. and Perez-Rodriguez,
J.M. 2012. Midday stem water potential as a useful tool for estimating irrigation
requirements in olive trees. Agric. Water Manage., 112: 43-54.
21.Motilva, M.J., Tovar, M.J., Romero, M.P., Alegre, S. and Girona, J. 2000. Influence of
regulated deficit irrigation strategies applied to olive trees (Arbequina cultivar) on oil yield
and oil composition during the fruit ripening period. J. Agric. Food Chem., 80(14): 2037-
2043.
22.Naor, A. 2006. Irrigation scheduling and evaluation of tree water status in deciduous
orchards. Hortic. Rev. 32: 111-165.
23.Perez-Lpez, D., Ribas, F., Moriana, A., Olmedilla, N. and de Juan, A. 2007. The effect of
irrigation schedules on the water relations and growth of a young olive (Olea europaea L.)
orchard. Agric. Water Manage. 89: 297-304.
24.Rapoport, H.F. and Costagli, G. 2004. The effect of water deficit during early fruit
development on olive fruit morphogenesis. J. Amer. Hort. Sci. 129(1): 121-127.
25.Rosecrance, R.C., Krueger, W.H., Milliron, L., Bloese, J., Garcia, C. and Mori, B. 2015.
Moderate regulated deficit irrigation can increase olive oil yields and decrease tree growth in
super high density Arbequina olive orchards. Sci. Hortic., 190: 75-82.
26.Rapoport, H.F., Hammami, S.B.M., Martins, P., Perez-Priego, O. and Orgaz, F. 2012
.Influence of water deficits at different times during olive tree inflorescence and flower
development. Environ. Exp. Bot. 77: 227-233.
27.Sofo, A., Manfreda, S., Fiorentino, M., Dichio, B. and Xiloyannis, C. 2008. The olive tree: A
paradigm for drought tolerance in Mediterranean climates. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 12: 293-
301.
28.Tognetti, R., D' Andria, R., Lavivi, A. and Morelli, G. 2006. The effect of deficit irrigation
on crop yield and development of Olea europaea L., (cvs Frantoio and Leccino). Europ. J.
Agron. 25: 356-364.