Success in budding of garden roses under cold climates – Effect of time and cultivar

Document Type : scientific research article

Authors

1 M.Sc. Student of the University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

2 Corresponding Author, Associate Prof. of the University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

3 Associate Prof. of the University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Rose plant is known as a very important shrub in the ornamental horticulture sector. They are mostly propagated by asexual methods such as rooted cuttings, grafted rootstocks both on commercial and home gardening scales. While budding has long been selected as a reliable and preferred way of garden rose reproduction on selected rootstocks over the past centuries, still it faces many restrictions imposed mostly by the seasonal physiological stage of the plants. In this study, we try to determine the best time for budding garden roses under cold climatic conditions by comparing the results of three seasons and two methods of grafting.

Materials and methods: This study was carried out in the rose garden of the University of Tabriz during 2016-2017. Two cultivars of roses i.e., Rosa hybrida ‘Avalanche’ and R. hybrida ‘ Blue Moon’ were selected and budded onto Natal Briar rootstocks. Three times of grafting season i.e., September, March, and June were chosen to do budding by either T-budding or chip budding method. Scions were cut out and taken from three positions of mother stems: upper, middle, and bottom parts. The budding type in September and June was T-budding (shield budding) but chip budding was applied for the grafts done in March. Grafted plants were then investigated for their success in grafting and growth (%), number of days needed to bud burst, quality of flowering stem (fresh, dry weight of stem and flowers, length and diameter of stem and flower) and other related characteristics. The factorial experimental design was used to plan and analyze data of June grafts.

Results: June grafts indicated almost 100% success in budding and stem growth while those propagated in September and March. However, the time needed for bud break was the least for September and March compared to June grafts. The longest stems about 45 cm were produced in ‘Blue Moon’ budded in March, while cultivar ‘Avalanche’ generated flowers with the highest diameter (45 mm) on the shoots arising from June grafts. The percentage of flowering was obtained at 100% for the shoots originating from the upper layer of the mother stem in both cultivars, however, it decreased to about 66% for shoots grown from the lower layer in ‘Blue Moon’ cultivar. Time to flowering was the least for the ‘Avalanche’ shoots arising from the upper layer with about 33 days while it increased to about 45 days for shoots grown from the lower layer of ‘Blue Moon’ cultivar. In general, the overall quality of September grafts such as stem length, diameter, number of nodes, dry and fresh weight and SLA of flowering stems were better than the grafts done in March and September. Comparing the cultivars, it was revealed that ‘Blue Moon’ cultivar performed better than ‘Avalanche’ in terms of producing longer stems with lesser stem thorns, but ‘Avalanche’ produced the largest flowers

Conclusions: This experiment demonstrated that June time can be selected as the right season for budding garden roses in regions with similar cold winter months. Flowering stems grown in June showed lower quality when compared with the stems arising from the grafts of September or March. This could be probably induced because of the rapid release of buds from internal preventions as a consequence of spring strong growth stimulators accumulated within the buds. Comparing the time of budding shows that June budding can bring growers many benefits in terms of the fewer days needed to flower, and considering, on the other hand, the lowest risk of chilling damage on graft union as well as scion buds during the cold months of winter.

Keywords

Main Subjects


1.Ouyang, L., Leus, L., & Van Labeke, M. C. (2019). Three-year screening for cold hardiness of garden roses. Scientia Horticulture, 24, 12-18.2.Bakhshoodeh, M., & Vaseghi, E. (2009). Marketing of Dutch roses in county of Isfahan. JWSS-Isfahan University of Technology, 13 (48), 377-388.3.Dole, B. J., & Wilkins, H. (2005). Floriculture: Principles and Species. Pearson Publisher. USA. 1023p.4.Qi, W. (2020). The Mechanism of improving the heat resistance of rose by grafting [M. D. Dissertation]. Huazhong Agricultural University. Wuhan. [In Chinese with English abstract]
5.Balaj, N. X., & Zogaj, R. (2011). Production seedlings of roses by grafting with bud for hybrid teas and climbing roses cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 43 (2), 155-160.6.Celık, H., Zengınbal, H., & Ozcan, M. (2006). Effect of budding performed by hand and with manual grafting unit on kiwifruit propagation in the field. Scientia Horticulture, 33 (2), 57.7.Lewis, W. J., & Alexander, D. (2008). Grafting and budding: A practical guide for fruit and nut plants and ornamentals. Landlinks Press.8.Daley, A. (2018). Searching for a rose garden: challenging psychiatry, fostering mad studies. Disability and Society,33 (9), 1540-1542.9.Aslanta, R., & Güleryüz, M. (2001). Effects of budding time on success and sapling growth in almond on Erzincan conditions. Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes, 56, 343-345.10.Vršič, S., Pulko, B., & Kocsis, L. (2015). Factors influencing grafting success and compatibility of grape rootstocks. Scientia Horticulture,181, 168-173.11.Gandev, S. (2007). Budding and grafting of the walnut (Juglans regia L.) and their effectiveness in Bulgaria. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 13 (6), 683.12.Salik, M. R., Khan, M. N., Ahmad, S., & Azhar, M. (2015). Grafting time affects scion growth in sweet orange under arid environment. Plant Science. 13 (1), 58-61.13.Izadi, Z., Zarei, H., & Alizadeh, M. (2014). Effect of time, cultivar and rootstock on success of rose propagation through stenting technique. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 2014.14.Sadeghi, Z., Shamshiri, M. H., Javanshah, A., & Bagheri, V. (2021). Effect of scion storage and grafting time on graft union of Pistachio minigrafting under in-vivo condition. Plant Productions, 44 (2), 259-270.15.Shin HyunSuk, S. H., Oh YoungJae, O. Y., & Kim Daeil, K. D. (2015). Differences in cold hardiness, carbohydrates, dehydrins and related gene expressions under an experimental deacclimation and reacclimation in Prunus persica. Physiologica Plantarum. 154 (4), 485-499.‏16.Soleimani, A., Rabiei, V., & Hassani, D. (2010). Effect of different techniques on walnut (Juglans regia L.) grafting. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 8 (29), 544-546.‏17.Bredmose, N., Hansen, J., & Nielsen, J. (1999). Factors intrinsic to the axillary bud determine topophysic effects on bud and shoot growth and flower development in Rosa hybrida. International Journal of Plant Science, 160 (5), 819-825.18.Zamski, E., Oshri, S., & Zieslin, N. (1985). Comparative morphology and anatomy of axillary buds along a rose shoot. Botanical Gazette, 146 (2), 208-212.19.Zieslin, N., Haaze, H., & Halevy, A. H. (1976). Components of axillary bud inhibition in rose plants. II. The effect of bud position on degree of inhibition. Botanical Gazette, 137 (4), 297-300.20.Matloobi, M., Ebrahimzade, H., Khaligi, A., & Hasandokht, M. (2008). Effect of different methods of canopy management on quality and yield of greenhouse cut-rose (Rosa hybrida ‘Habari’). Journal of Agricultural Science, 1 (18), 49-59. [In Persian with English abstract]
21.Zieslin, N., & Halevy, A. H. (1976). Components of axillary bud inhibition in rose plants. I. The effect of different plant parts (correlative inhibition). Botanical Gazette, 137 (4), 291-296.22.Kim, S. H., & Lieth, J. H. (2004). Effect of shoot-bending on productivity and economic value estimation of cut-flower roses grown in Coir and UC Mix. Scientia Horticulture, 99 (3-4), 331-343.23.Sivudu, B. V., Reddy, M. L. N., Dorajeerao, A. V. D., & Hussain, S. F. (2014). Seasonal variation in success of veneer grafting of mango under Andhra Pradesh (India) conditions. Plant Archives, 14 (1), 133-37.24.Arteca, R. N. (1996). Plant growth substances: principles and applications. Springer Science & Business Media. 456 p.25.Davoudi Pahnekolayi, M., Tehranifar, A., Samiei, L., & Shoor, M. (2019). Optimizing culture medium ingredients and micrografting devices can promote in vitro micrografting of cut roses on different rootstocks. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 137, 265-274.26.Singh, P., Singh, A. P., & Sane, A. P. (2019). Differential and reciprocal regulation of ethylene pathway genes regulates petal abscission in fragrant and non-fragrant roses. Plant Science,280, 330-339.27.Ouyang, L., Leus, L., De Keyser, E., & Van Labeke, M. C. (2019). Seasonal changes in cold hardiness and carbohydrate metabolism in four garden rose cultivars. Journal of Plant Physiology, 232, 188-199.28.Taiz, L., & Zeiger, E. (2002). Plant Physiology. Sinauer associates. 679 p.29.Kim, Y. M., Heinzel, N., Giese, J. O., Koeber, J., Melzer, M., Rutten, T., & Hajirezaei, M. R. (2013). A dual role of tobacco hexokinase 1 in primary metabolism and sugar sensing. Plant, Cell & Environment, 36 (7), 1311-1327.30.Fayek, M. A., El-Zaher, M. H. A., El-Kubaisy, O., & Al-Darweesh, M. H. (2004). Stock-scion relationship in olive at the nursery stage. Agricutural Sciences, 42, 205-224.31.ElSayed, A. I., Rafudeen, M. S., & Golldack, D. (2014). Physiological aspects of raffinose family oligosaccharides in plants: protection against abiotic stress. Plant Biology, 16 (1), 1-8.32.Karimi, H. R., & Nowrozy, M. (2017). Effects of rootstock and scion on graft success and vegetative parameters of pomegranate. Scientia Horticulture,214, 280-287.